🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that could add up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The district court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the districts established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's ruling. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan stated in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Battle

This decision occurs during a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican majority. Typically, boundary revision happens after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have pushed back with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, Democratic leaders decried the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior Democratic leader said the court had yet again eroded its standing by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.