🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because political disagreements over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.